The evidence that
humans are causing global warming is strong, but
the question of what to do about it remains controversial. Economics, sociology, and politics are all important factors in planning for the future.
the question of what to do about it remains controversial. Economics, sociology, and politics are all important factors in planning for the future.
Even if we stopped
emitting greenhouse gases (GHGs) today, the Earth would still warm by another
degree Fahrenheit or so. But what we do from today forward makes a big
difference. Depending on our choices, scientists predict that the Earth
could eventually warm by as little as 2.5 degrees or as much as 10 degrees
Fahrenheit.
A commonly cited
goal is to stabilize GHG concentrations around 450-550 parts per million (ppm),
or about twice pre-industrial levels. This is the point at which many believe
the most damaging impacts of climate change can be avoided. Current
concentrations are about 380 ppm, which means there isn't much time to
lose. According to the IPCC, we'd have to reduce GHG emissions by 50% to
80% of what they're on track to be in the next century to reach this level.
Is this possible?
Many people and
governments are already working hard to cut greenhouse gases, and everyone can
help.
Researchers
Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow at Princeton University have suggested one
approach that they call "stabilization wedges." This means reducing
GHG emissions from a variety of sources with technologies available in the next
few decades, rather than relying on an enormous change in a single area.
They suggest 7 wedges that could each reduce emissions, and all of them
together could hold emissions at approximately current levels for the next 50
years, putting us on a potential path to stabilize around 500 ppm.
There are many
possible wedges, including improvements to energy efficiency and vehicle fuel
economy (so less energy has to be produced), and increases in wind and solar
power, hydrogen produced from renewable sources, biofuels (produced from
crops), natural gas, and nuclear power. There is also the potential to
capture the carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuels and store it underground—a
process called "carbon sequestration."
In addition to
reducing the gases we emit to the atmosphere, we can also increase the amount
of gases we take out of the atmosphere. Plants and trees absorb CO2 as
they grow, "sequestering" carbon naturally. Increasing
forestlands and making changes to the way we farm could increase the amount of
carbon we're storing.
Some of these
technologies have drawbacks, and different communities will make different
decisions about how to power their lives, but the good news is that there are a
variety of options to put us on a path toward a stable climate.
No comments:
Post a Comment